More From Gurman’s Pre-WWDC Leak Report

More from Gurman’s Friday-before-WWDC report at Bloomberg. But before I start quoting, man, his report reads as though he’s gotten the notes from someone who’s already watched Monday’s keynote. Don’t follow the link and don’t continue reading this post if you don’t want to see a bunch of spoilers, several of which weren’t even rumors until Gurman dropped this. It’s astonishing how much of what we supposedly know about Apple’s WWDC keynote announcements is entirely from Gurman. If he switched to a different beat we’d be almost entirely in dark; as it stands, he’s seemingly spoiled most of it.

First, he says yes, Apple’s going to do a chatbot, powered by OpenAI:

The company’s new AI system will be called Apple Intelligence, and it will come to new versions of the iPhone, iPad and Mac operating systems, according to people familiar with the plans. There also will be a partnership with OpenAI that powers a ChatGPT-like chatbot. And the tech giant is preparing to show new software for the Vision Pro headset, Apple Watch and TV platforms.

A question Gurman’s report doesn’t answer is where this chatbot will be. Is it going to be a new app — a dedicated AI chatbot app? What would that app be called? “Siri”? Or would Apple make Siri a persona you can chat with in Messages? I seem to think Apple wouldn’t put it in Messages, but if they do, will we be able to include it in group chats? That seems like fun on the surface but a privacy problem on deeper thought. When I’m talking to Siri one-on-one I expect Siri to know about me. If Siri were in a group Messages chat it would have be private.

There are a lot of questions even if the answer is that it’s a new standalone app. Will the conversations sync between devices? If so, how does that jibe with on-device processing? If I start a chatbot conversation on my Mac can I continue it on my iPhone? How does that work if the conversation on pertains to files or data that’s only on my Mac? On-device processing raises questions that don’t exist with cloud-only processing.

One feature that will likely get a lot of attention among Gen Z — and perhaps the rest of the population — will be AI-created emoji. This will use AI to create custom emoji characters on the fly that represent phrases or words as they’re being typed. That means there will be many more options than the ones in the standardized emoji library that has long been built into the iPhone.

Will this be like Memoji — a feature of Messages — not the OS? I’m guessing yes. So you won’t be able to send these emoji through, say, WhatsApp, Signal, or even email. It kind of makes sense. To be cross-platform it either needs to be part of the Unicode spec (which isn’t even possible for on-the-fly custom emoji) or would have be rendered as an image attachment. And we can paste whatever images we want anywhere we want already. What makes emoji (and Memoji) special is that you don’t treat them like images, you treat them like text.

The Messages app is getting some non-AI tweaks, including a change to the effects feature — the thing that lets you send fireworks and other visual elements to the people you’re texting. Users will now be able to trigger an effect with individual words, rather than the entire message. There will be new colorful icons for Tapbacks, which let you quickly respond to a message with a heart, exclamation point or other character (they’re currently gray). And users will have the ability to Tapback a message with any emoji. There’s another frequently requested feature coming as well: the ability to schedule a message to be sent later.

Not sure what the difference is between “colorful Tapbacks” and “Tapback a message with any emoji”, but this one gets a legit finally.

Safari in macOS 15, codenamed Glow, is getting some changes, but it seems unlikely that Apple is going to unveil its own ad blocker — something that’s been reported as a possibility. Advertisers already pushed back heavily against Apple’s App Tracking Transparency, or ATT, in iOS 14 a few years ago, and the company doesn’t need another privacy-related headache.

Built-in ad blocking in Safari wouldn’t be a privacy headache; blocking ads can only increase privacy. It would be an antitrust/regulatory headache. The argument from ATT opponents is that it steers advertisers toward purchasing ads in the App Store, where the ATT rules don’t apply.